Category Archives: social networks

Digital Life, individualism, social networks, U.S. media, Web 2.0

YouYear

1 Comment

So, 2006 has been the Year of You. “You” as any individual, consumer, user, amateur, person, personality, etc. With a strong tendency toward netizens living in the U.S. and participating in the so-called “Web 2.0” phenomenon.

For instance, “You” are (is) TIME‘s person of the year.

TIME.com: Now It’s Your Turn — Dec. 25, 2006 — Page 1

TIME.com: Time’s Person of the Year: You — Dec. 25, 2006 — Page 1

To some occasional readers of U.S. mainstream magazines, TIME‘s decision sounds like a rehash of the July 1 issue of Business 2.0:

The 50 Who Matter Now – July 1, 2006

1 You! THE CONSUMER AS CREATOR WHY YOU MATTER: They’ve long said the customer is always right. But they never really meant it. Now they have no choice. You–or rather, the collaborative intelligence of tens of millions of people, the networked you–continually create and filter new forms of content, anointing the useful, the relevant, and the amusing and rejecting the rest. You do it on websites like Amazon, Flickr, and YouTube, via podcasts and SMS polling, and on millions of self-published blogs. In every case, you’ve become an integral part of the action as a member of the aggregated, interactive, self-organizing, auto-entertaining audience. But the You Revolution goes well beyond user-generated content. Companies as diverse as Delta Air Lines and T-Mobile are turning to you to create their ad slogans. Procter & Gamble and Lego are incorporating your ideas into new products. You constructed open-source and are its customer and its caretaker. None of this should be a surprise, since it was you–your crazy passions and hobbies and obsessions–that built out the Web in the first place. And somewhere out there, you’re building Web 3.0. We don’t yet know what that is, but one thing’s for sure: It will matter.

Quite insightful in both cases. But not as much as the Internet’s Six Cultures model.

Personally, I’d like to see more people discussing the concepts of individualism, self-determination, creativity, social change, mercantilism, democracy, egoticism, and global identities in this You-focused context.

Blogging, social butterfly effect, social networking, social networks, Yulblog

"It's A Small World After All" (Blogging Edition)

7 Comments

Blogging is fun. Among the neat effects of blogging is that, though bloggers aren’t at all alike, they tend to be “like-minded people,” despite striking individual differences.

Cases in point, from last night.

Went to an event organized through Montreal Linkup, an event organisation system with obscure ties to Craigslist. At one point Saib, one of the participants, was talking about a blog post he had read. Turns out, he was describing my ramblings (and open letter) about Montreal culture and the Linkup system. I did feel quite proud. Not that he had read my post (or that he remembered anything about it), but that the post had exactly the kind of effect I wanted. Though blogging can feel awkward in my case, and I often feel like I’m writing in a vacuum (for several reasons, feedback to my entries has been extremely limited), it leads to those situations where different parts of your life are linked.

Also present at the Linkup event was Shiraz, a fellow YulBlogger. Thanks to the Yulblog Confessions from the August YulBlog gathering, I had went on Shiraz’s blog and even used her technique of blogging different topics in the same post, right here. Before the Linkup event, I didn’t know Shiraz personally, but chances are now that we might link to each other.

Which is a major issue among bloggers. Been thinking about it myself, thanks in part to Sylvain Carle (yet another YulBlogger). And it has influenced my blogging philosophy (whether I notice it or not). No wonder network analysis has been growing steadily. (Man! Do I love putting my academic hat in the middle of my ramblings…)

On occasion, I will insert as many outgoing links in my blog entries as possible. Several reasons for this practise, including the fact that it’s easier to find links if they’re on my blog. But there might be more of a wish to get comments from other bloggers by teasing them with links to their blogs (thanks to pings and trackbacks).

Yes, posting about blogging is allegedly uncool, and linking to your own entries seems silly. But I’m having fun doing this… 🙂

In fact, if you think this whole blog is lame, do comment here! 😉

advocacy, aesthetics, Alcohol, art, Beer, cluetrain, Cluetrain Manifesto, community-building, consumerism, consumption, craft beer, craft beer culture, creativity, cuisine, cultural capital, cultural diversity, democracy, development strategies, economics, ethnocentrism, Ethnography, experience, expertise, food and society, foodies, globalization, glocal, grassroots, groupthink, hegemony, individualism, joie de vivre, leapfrog effect, location-specific, market economy, marketing, mass media, moral enterpreneurs, musings, nationalism, nostalgie, playfulness, pleasure, podcasts, product and process, productivity, Radio Open Source, rants, responsible drinking, snobbery, social capital, social change, social dynamics, social networks, standardization, statistics, success in life, taste, tasting, trendiness, trusting people, United States, universalism, writing

Individualism, Freedom, and Food

5 Comments

A surprisingly superficial podcast episode on what could have been a very deep subject.

Open Source » Blog Archive » The End of Free Will?

start a conversation about manipulation, persuasion and freedom from choice

To summarize the main issue of that episode: is marketing and "upselling" by restaurant chains undermining the individual freedom to choose quality food? Apparently simple a question, but billed as much more than that.

Maybe they refrained from delving deeper into any of those issues because philosophical discussions, perhaps aesthetic ones especially, are off limits in "polite company" in U.S. media. Too bad.

Actually, I’m genuinely disappointed. Not necessarily because restaurant chains are very important an issue for me (in Montreal, they don’t seem to have the exact same type of impact and I love to cook). But because the show’s participants all came very close to saying very important things about individualism, food, and freedom. The first two are too rarely discussed, IMHO, and the third could have been the "hook" to discuss the other two.

Ah, well…

If you want to know more about my thoughts on this podcast episode, check out some of the tags below.

adaptation, cultural awareness, informality, Montreal, Paris, Québec, social networking, social networks

Montreal Culture and Linkup

8 Comments

Noticed an event on Montreal Linkup set up by the Linkup founder. In it, he says:

I’d like to help Montreal Linkup eventually become just as active, so I am scheduling a series of events on the Montreal site to help get things started. I will not be able to attend this event myself, but I wanted to provide this opportunity for people on Montreal Linkup to gather for dinner and get acquainted in a relaxed, comfortable setting.

(Follows: a description of the restaurant, apparently coming from a guide.)

Given my ongoing commentary on the Montreal Linkup and Quebec culture, I really had to say something.

Here’s my message to him:

Firinn,

Though you may do the same for all of the less active Linkups, I get the impression that you’re trying to get the Montreal Linkup up and running.
As a cultural anthropologist from Montreal, I feel compelled to give you my perspective on what may or may not work. I blogged specifically about this issue.

Since then, I participated in two events in Montreal with people from New York Linkup.

Obviously, you know your business very well and this is not meant as a way to “teach you your job,” but in case these comments make a difference, I wanted to send them to you.

Clearly, every Linkup has its own life, feel, “personality.” From direct contacts with members from Boston and New York City, it seems that these differences are quite consequential. My argument is that Montreal might be even “more different.” Businesses from the U.S. that have established branches here were either already well-established outside of the U.S. or went on to become quite well-established elsewhere. Chances are that your success outside of North America (Paris, London, Hong Kong, Shanghai) will bring success to the Montreal Linkup, and vice-versa.
The key here is to adapt to the culture.

So let me pinpoint some differences between Montreal and other North American cities in the hope of helping you adapt Linkup to Montreal. Similarities between Montreal and the rest of North America are quite obvious but differences are making adaptation desirable.

The first thing to realize is that, as you probably know, Francophones make up for the majority of Montreal’s population (including a significant part of the business community which seems to be your primary target). This is not to say that you alienate two-thirds of the population by having an English-only site. After all, most of us French-speakers also read and write in English fairly frequently. (Contrary to Paris, English proficiency may not necessarily correlate with business-mindedness.) Yet the sociolinguistic constitution of the city might help explain why homegrown solutions are usually preferred. Quebec portals and blogs are really quite popular and even the traditional media are controlled locally (in a unique and much-bemoaned example of vertical integration).
Even English-speaking Montrealers perceive themselves as significantly distinct from the rest of North America. This is no mere city rivalry.It’s an actual identity.

While it has little to do with Hollywood or New York City, Montreal has its own star system. Montreal celebrities aren’t necessarily well-known outside of Quebec but they have a tremendous impact on the culture and appear in most of the media. Those celebrities are perceived as very personable and people meet them regularly, as they live in specific neighborhoods and tend to “hang out” at specific cafés, bars, and restaurants (hint: not Nizza). If a Montreal celebrity were to host an event, chances of getting the word out and the ball rolling would increase tremendously. Few celebrities are truly part of the two language communities but attendees may come from both communities if they really feel compelled.

To compare with Boston, locations listed for the Montreal Linkup (Saint-Jérôme, Joliette, Granby, Drumondville) are more like Springfield than like Cambridge. Similarly, your “Paris area” sounds as if the New York area included Boston, Philadelphia, Minneapolis, and Bangor. A common way to divide up the Montreal region is (Island of) Montreal, South Shore, Laval, North Shore. Quebec itself is divided up in very distinct (and large) regions (the aforementioned cities are all in different regions).

Quebec culture in general tends to emphasize informality in many circumstances. One reason the Montreal Linkup appears to only be working with a specific group of entrepreneurs is that most other people are quite fond of impromptu, informal gatherings.
For an example of a homegrown network, you might want to look into the history of YulBiz, started by members of YulBlog (a blogger network).
The YulBlog rules may clash with Linkup’s “Good Hosting Guide.”

By the way, the website for Nizza is http://www.nizza.ca/.
Sorry to be blunt but the link you gave is for a restaurant in Minneapolis. It might just be that you were going through a list for all Linkup locations but it makes us think that your choice was arbitrary. There are many great restaurants in Montreal to host Linkup-type events, including way too many French restaurants. It doesn’t sound like Nizza would be a first choice for anyone to make.

Again, I hope some of this can help you understand what needs to be done to make Montreal Linkup a success.

—
Alexandre
http://enkerli.wordpress.com/

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Apple, consumerism, consumption, content, creativity, cult of personality, Digital Life, digital lifestyle, humanism, hype, intellectual property, iPod, iTunes, market economy, marketing, mass media, media, mediascape, movies, music, music scenes, performance, popular culture, product and process, professionals, social change, social networks, standardization, Tech, technology, trendiness

They Dropped The Other Shoe

5 Comments

[Disclaimer: I’m not necessarily an Apple fanboy but I have been an enthusiastic Mac user since 1987 and have owned several Apple products, from an iPod to a QuickTake camera. I also think that technology is having a big impact on arts, media, and entertainment.]

Just watched Apple’s "Showtime" Special Event. Didn’t really read or even listen to anything much about it yet. During that event, Apple CEO Steve Jobs introduced new versions of all the iPod models, a new version of iTunes, and the addition of movies to the iTunes store. In addition, Jobs gave a sneak peak of an upcoming box to link iTunes with televisions and stereo systems.

People are likely to have been disappointed by the announcements. They’re probably saying that Steve Jobs’s famous "Reality Distortion Field" isn’t working, or that he lost his "mojo." They might even wonder about his health. Again…

Not that the new products are really boring, but there tend to be high expectations surrounding Apple announcements. This one is no different as people expected wireless capabilities on iPods and recording capabilities on the new "media centre" box, which was in fact part of the expected new products from Apple.

But this event is significant in another way. Through it, Apple explained their strategy, revealed a number of years ago as the Digital Hub. What some have called "convergence," quite a few years ago. Nothing really new. It’s just coming into full focus.

Though we may never know how much of it unfolded as planned, Apple’s media/tech strategy may appear rather prescient in retrospect. IIRC, it started in 1996, during Gil Amelio’s tenure. Or, more probably, in 1997 during the switch between Amelio and Jobs. Even by, say, 1999, that strategy was still considered a bold move. That was before the first iPod which, itself, was before iTunes, the iTunes Music Store, and most other current media-centric technologies at Apple. It was also at a time when user-generated content was relatively unimportant. In other ways, that was during the "Web 1.0" Internet bubble, before the "Web 2.0" craze for blogs, podcasts, and "social networking."

Apple isn’t the only corporation involved in the changes in the convergence between technology and the world of "content" (arts, media, entertainment). But it has played a key role. Whatever his success as a CEO, Steve Jobs has influenced the direction of change and, to an extent, shape a part of digital life to his own liking. While he’s clearly not clueless, his vision of the link between "content" and technology is quite specific. It does integrate user-generated content of "varying degrees of professionalism" (which he joked about during his presentation) but it gives precedence to the "content industry" (involving such powerful groups and lobbies as WIPO, NAB, MPAA, RIAA, etc.). Jobs’s position at Pixar makes him a part of that industry. Which is quite different from what arts and expressive culture can be.

Jobs invites musicians on stage with him (John Mayer, Wynton Marsalis, John Legend). He respects musicians and he might even appreciate their work. But his view of their work is that they produce content to consumed. For Jobs, music tracks, audiobooks, television episodes, movies, and music videos are all "contents" to be enjoyed by consumers. Now, the consumer can enjoy content "anywhere" as Apple is "in your den, in your living-room, in your car, and in your pocket." But what about public spaces? Concert halls, churches, coffee shops, parks, public libraries, classrooms, etc.? Oh! Apple can be there too! Yeah, of course. But those are not part of the primary vision. In Apple’s view, consumers all have their own iTunes accounts, media libraries, preferences, and content-consuming habits. A nuclear family may count as a unit to a certain extent (as Bob Iger pointed out in his "cameo appearance" during Jobs’s event). But the default mode is private consumption.

And there’s nothing wrong with that. Even the coolest things online are often based on the same model. It’s just that it’s not the only way to do things. Music, for instance, can be performed in public. In fact, it can be a collaborative process. The performers themselves need not be professionals. There’s no need for an audience, even. And there’s no need to see it as "intellectual property." Music is not a product. It’s a process by which human beings organize sound.

Ah, well…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

activism, advocacy, amateurs, cluetrain, Cluetrain Manifesto, Communities, community-building, consumption, Creative Commons, creativity, cultural capital, democracy, digital lifestyle, Empowerment, food and society, friendship, geek crowd, globalization, groupthink, hegemony, humanism, innovation, intellectual property, knowledge, leapfrog effect, mindshare, moral enterpreneurs, movies, music scenes, Old Media, online privacy, online publishing, open-source, openness, optimism, participatory culture, popular culture, product and process, social dynamics, social networks, social publishing, specialists, stereotypes, tasting, technology, trusting people, YouTube

Music, Food, Industries, Piracy

Leave a comment

000ady6y (PNG Image, 200×125 pixels)

Noticed it in Steal This Film. A very appropriate message. Process over product. Music is not a commodity. Food does not grow on profits.

Blogged with Flock

blogosphere, blogs, podcasts, social networks, Web 2.0

Tikiboom, RocketBarTV

Leave a comment

The latest Rocketboom episode is a cross-over with TikiBarTV. With speculation that LaLa might have been considered as a replacement for Amanda Congdon, the cross-referencing is even more likely to generate buzz.

Yes, as many have been saying, the new personalized/community-oriented syndicated online distribution systems for content (all these “Web 2.0” things based on versions of RSS and Atom) like blogs, podcasts, and vidcasts/vlogs are like an “echo chamber” or some other metaphor about self-referential, inward-looking, insular communities with rather high clustering coefficient. Cliques, so to speak. But not really elitist per se. And, in fact, not at all close-ended. Just groups which are their own little universe.

blogue, café, cafés, Canada, Francophonie, grassroots, local, localization, Montreal, podcasts, Québec, radio, ramblings, social networks, social publishing, stereotypes

Bloguage (Bloguer au Québec II)

Leave a comment

Michel Leblanc en entrevue sur le Carnet techno de Bruno Guglielminetti. Michel a d’ailleurs répondu à mon propre billet sur la blogosphère québécoise, ce qui m’a permis d’admirer son propre blogue (et de commenter sur un de ses billets).
ClodiMedius a aussi répondu à mon billet et a créé son propre billet sur le même sujet. Nous devrions aller prendre un café dès mon retour à Montréal.
Cette chaîne de contacts par blogues interposés a démarré grâce à un billet de Marie-Chantale Turgeon mentionné par Guglielminetti dans l’épisode précédent de son carnet en balado-diffusion.

Donc, ça se précise.
Dans cette entrevue avec Guglielminetti, Michel parle brièvement de la formation de YULBiz, petit groupe de blogueurs et de gens d’affaires montréalais créé par l’entremise de blogues. (Michel explique la création de YULBiz entre 5:58 et 7:35 pendant l’entrevue). Selon Michel, la formule de YULBiz commence à avoir des échos à Québec (la capitale) et en France. On peut penser au marketing viral (si on le désire ardemment) ou même à un mouvement “grassroots” comme Kino.
Évidemment, c’est pas une formule réellement unique, il y a certainement beaucoup d’exemples ailleurs. Mais c’est un regroupement qui s’est créé à l’aide de cette fameuse blogosphère québécoise, prouvant donc la vitalité de ladite -sphère.
Détail intéressant, YULBiz semble avoir été déclenché par une rencontre dans un café. Rien d’unique là-dedans: la Révolution Française elle-même a été planifiée lors de rencontres dans des cafés parisiens. Mais c’est une tendance très forte, pour nous Québécois, de donner rendez-vous à des nouveaux contacts sans nécessairement avoir de but très précis. Ici à Northampton, ma femme a eu un peu de difficulté à appliquer ce même genre de procédure en ce sens que le rendez-vous semblait présupposer un but plus spécifique. Ici dans le Nord-Est des États-Unis, des amis se rencontrent parfois sans but précis (“just to hang out”) mais les nouveaux contacts requièrent souvent des procédures légèrement plus formelles. C’est un détail, mais il est lié à plusieurs aspects de la culture québécoise, depuis le statut des rapports amicaux avec distinction sexuelle (c.-à-d. qu’au Québec une femme et un homme peuvent facilement être de véritables amis) à la gestion de l’horaire hors de la vie professionnelle (un soupçon de «compartimentalisation»).

Donc, la blogosphère québécoise dans tout ça. Une de ses caractéristiques (probablement partagée avec plusieurs autres parties de la Blogosphère globale) est de donner lieu à des rencontres in situ. Cette tendance est peut-être due en partie au fait que les Québécois accordent beaucoup d’importance aux rapports directs mais elle est surtout liée à un contexte de concentration démographique métropolitaine. Dans ce cas-ci, on parlerait plutôt de blogosphère montréalaise, puisque c’est le fait d’habiter à Montréal (code d’aéroport «YUL») qui semble avoir permis aux membres de YULBiz de se rencontrer. Et, parlant de blogosphère montréalaise, un regroupement de blogueurs de la métropole québécoise s’appelle YULblog. Et ils semblent se rencontrer régulièrement.
Une autre caractéristique, assez évidente peut-être, c’est que les blogueurs québécois (ou, du moins, montréalais) franchissent la barrière linguistique entre Anglophones et Francophones. C’est une tendance assez prononcées parmi plusieurs groupes (y compris des brasseurs-maison), mais ça demeure un phénomène très intéressant.
Ensuite, on pourrait parler de l’importance de la «vie expressive» (art, poésie, création, musique, etc.) dans les blogues québécois. Michel Leblanc lui-même blogue de façon poétique. Rien de rare là-dedans, plusieurs blogues ailleurs ont des contenus artistiques. Mais le mode expressif semble assez fréquent dans la blogosphère québécoise. Quoique, c’est une observation très préliminaire qui mériterait une analyse un tant soit peu poussée. À ce sujet, cette fameuse étude comparative entre internautes français et québécois me paraît réellement fascinante.

Dans ce contexte, et pour être parfaitement honnête, il me semble plus utile de tenter d’observer la blogosphère québécoise «pour elle-même» (par ses propres caractéristiques) que de la mesurer à un critère démographique. Bon, c’est un peu le culturaliste et relativiste qui parle, mais quand même… Un ami Iranien me disait à propos de la communauté iranienne de Montréal qu’elle était plus petite que la communauté iranienne d’une ville un peu plus grande, mais qu’elle était selon lui «de meilleure qualité». Sans nécessairement parler de qualité intrinsèque, on peut dire que la blogosphère québécoise est petite mais qu’elle est certainement dynamique.

blogue, identity, Québec, social networks

Blogues et identités

Leave a comment

En réponse à ClodiMedius (lui-même répondant à un de mes billets).

Puisque j’ai tendance à être plus personnel et informel quand je blogue en français, ma réponse à ton commentaire va être un peu plus familière que son origine (et que la plupart de mes billets, surtout ceux écrits en anglais).
Tout d’abord, merci beaucoup d’avoir envoyé ce commentaire sur mon blogue. Je blogue pas pour recevoir des commentaires mais j’apprécie beaucoup les quelques commentaires que je reçois. En fait, j’ai parfois l’intention de prendre des moyens précis pour augmenter le nombre de commentaire sur mon blogue. Par simple curiosité pour la chose humaine, pas par désir irrépréssible d’être le centre d’une attention particulière.

Juste pour être clair, est-ce que mon billet t’a fait réagir pour une raison précise? C’était une réponse à une discussion sur le blogue de Marie-Chantal Turgeon. C’est dans cette discussion que certains semblaient déplorer l’état de la blogosphère québécoise. Mon opinion, en gros, c’est qu’elle se porte relativement bien parce que ses critères de réussite ne sont pas liés à d’autres blogosphères. Le Québec d’aujourd’hui, son insularité et son provincialisme compris, fait son bonhomme de chemin sans trop se comparer au reste du monde. On se sent parfois fiers (avec raison, selon moi) de ce qui se passe au Québec et on regarde ailleurs pour s’inspirer et pour communiquer avec le plus grand nombre. Mais quand on agit, c’est pas pour se mesurer à des moulins. Donc, la crise d’identité que tu perçois, je la perçois surtout comme une dynamique sociale assez fluide et «organique». Nos différences d’opinion sont surtout une question de perspective, j’imagine.

Pour situer un peu les choses, au cas où c’était pas clair. Je suis Québécois de naissance, Suisse d’origine, Acadien par alliance, Ouest-Africain par intérêts académiques et je vis souvent hors du Québec. (En ce moment-même, je suis à Northampton, dans l’ouest du Massachusetts).
Je suis aussi anthropologue (ethnolinguiste, ethnologue, ethnographe et ethnomusicologue) alors je m’intéresse beaucoup aux processus liés aux identités culturelles et sociales. Soit dit en passant, pour la question de l’ethnocentrisme, faut pas confondre avec la fierté identitaire. Aussi, ça aide de voir que l’ethnocentrisme est très fréquemment présent dans tout rapport entre groupes. Nous sommes beaucoup à lutter contre l’ethnocentrisme mais l’idée c’est de l’endiguer, pas de l’éradiquer.

Bon, pour revenir plus précisément aux points que tu soulèves. C’est probablement difficile de répertorier cette blogosphère québécoise dont on parle avec tant de verve. Mais, comme tu le remarques, on se retrouve assez facilement, entre Québécois. Pas seulement entre Francophones ou même entre amateurs du Québec. Mais spécifiquement entre Québécois. On ne passe même pas par Loïc «Bloïc» Le Meur pour entrer en contact, les uns avec les autres. Dans ce cas-ci, nous nous sommes greffés au réseau de Marie-Chantal au sein duquel chaque nœud est lié à plusieurs autres réseaux (dont certains sont spécifiquement québécois, d’autres non). Pour un groupe aussi «restreint» (au sens démographique, disons) que le nôtre, c’est assez inusité.

La question du lectorat est fascinante. Ma propre réaction provenait en partie de commentaires d’un autre Québécois vivant aux États-Unis. Si certains d’entre nous veulent être lus, pour d’autres, c’est moins important. Dans mon cas, j’aimerais bien (comme je le mentionnais plus haut) recevoir plus de commentaires et je suis bien content de voir que certains lisent quelques entrées de mon blogue, mais ça change pas grand-chose à ma façon de bloguer. Je blogue pour moi-même, pour écrire, pour mettre des idées en forme, pour conserver une trace de certains aspects de ma vie, pour distribuer certaines choses à des amis (plutôt que de leur envoyer par courriel), pour avoir une présence relativement stable en-ligne (de sorte que les gens qui me connaissent puissent me contacter), etc.
Comme tu le remarques peut-être, mes billets avec des thèmes plus spécifiquement québécois sont relativement rares. En fait, j’en écris probablement plus quand je suis à l’extérieur du Québec, par nostalgie.

Pour être plus spécifique, par rapport à ton propre blogue. Tu parles de WordPress et des catégories. Une des choses que j’apprécie de WP (même si j’aimerais utiliser une méthode plus semblable à celle de Del.icio.us) c’est la possibilité de créer des catégories et des étiquettes à tout moment. En fait, je crée beaucoup trop de catégories (en moyenne trois par billet), ce qui m’a poussé à masquer la liste des catégories des pages de mon blogue. C’est un principe d’ouverture. Mes blogues se veulent disparates et n’ont donc pas de thèmes particuliers. Ils doivent me représenter, autant que faire se peut. Ce qui implique que je cherche pas à rejoindre un groupe particulier (disons, les torréfacteurs amateurs). Amusant que tu fasses référence à l’arôme de la torréfaction et à l’anthropologie. Ça me porte à croire que tu as lu d’autres billets sur mon blogue. Et ta réponse me pousse à aller voir tes propres blogues. On crée donc un contact. Oui, notre «québécité» a servi de base à ce contact, mais les contacts que nous avons toi et moi avec d’autres internautes proviennent certainement de beaucoup d’autres «prétextes».
En fait, je pense que je vais t’envoyer un message privé pour continuer la conversation. Mais c’est agréable de pouvoir discuter publiquement sans s’être rencontrés. Les listes de diffusions ainsi que les forums sur le Web servent souvent le même rôle mais les blogues sont plus individualisés.

Merci encore!