All posts by dispar

Changes in the "Piled Higher and Deeper Community"

There’s been a fair amount of discussion about this:
Cliffhanger for the “Piled Higher and Deeper” comic strip

[Disclaimer: Been reading PhDcomics for about a year, will submit my dissertation draft soon, haven’t bought anything from Jorge Cham (the comic strip author) yet, am a musician, and have no training in advertising.]

Some really good points were made on the forum. For those who don’t get it: no, it’s not about having to cough up money for something we take for granted. Most of us aren’t angry, in fact. Just taken aback and maybe slightly disappointed. Not by Jorge’s choice of strategy. But by the loss of something else.

Of course, it’s not a new strategy to change a freely accessible site into something from which people can make money. Many online “venues” have gone through something similar. Some of them were in fact based on voluntary contributions and were eventually transformed in commercial products, often relying on exclusive rights or paid accounts (iMDb.com, CDDB.com…). They may all work out fine. But the change implies a cut, a loss.

Thing is, we don’t know what’ll happen with the readership for Piled higher and Deeper. It may in fact go up if the comic books get distributed widely and shipping charges go down. But it’ll certainly change. A community was being built and those who have been part of that community are “being reminded that it was all about an artist’s desire to get paid for specific work.” Part of the magic that tied people together is gone. Yeah, sure, it’s the fault of those in the community to believe that fans mattered in the grand scheme of things. It was all an illusion and we got a glimpse behind the curtain.

Now, many signs were already there that PhDcomics.com would change. Jorge got his degree. He started this JennyJetpack.com thing which doesn’t have a forum yet and is likely to attract a completely different audience. Strips were increasingly plot-driven. And, for some reason, it seems to me personally that the site in general featured more “money-related” links. Well, maybe the Google ads, the Amazon links, and the “What’s New” section were always there but they seem more prominent now. Maybe because the site hasn’t changed much apart from that (and the strips themselves, of course).
Even the strips themselves may have lost part of their edge. Not that Piled higher and Deeper has jumped the shark, but…

With an enthusiastic fanbase made of people who are going to graduate and have money soon, with some neat gear that people can buy a little bit more easily (I hope!), and with new books being published by the author, one would think that readers didn’t need to be baited more.

Many other things could have been done.
Stopping the strip after graduating characters and going on to some other endeavors (maybe Jenny Jetpack) would have generated even more goodwill for Jorge on the part of fans. Writing a completely new comic book, distributing it widely, and announcing it on PhDcomics.com would have been a good strategy. Adding new “features” to the book (colour strips, added artwork, commentaries, games, foreword…) may all help. Getting shipping costs down. Getting wider distribution. Creating new merchandise (“gear”) to go with the second book. Warning people that Mike’s defense would be a bait. Asking people for donations. All of these would have been ways for Jorge to financially benefit from PhDcomics.com without alienating anyone.
Well, I might be completely off. But Ubik, Iambicity, n3wb, Nia, Rachel, and others all have great points that seem to relate to similar issues with Jorge’s strategy.
Some others are very dismissive, which doesn’t help. As graduate students (and friends of graduate students), we can (and probably should) have honest discussions without name-calling. No, it’s not about complaining. No, it’s not about free or non-free. No, it’s not about corporate greed. It might be about commodification.
But it’s mostly about changes in a community model that was based on people’s sense of belonging.

Ah, well…

Mobilisation collective: une perspective du Nouveau-Brunswick

Grève étudiante au Québec : contre la marchandisation de l’éducation
Très intéressant article sur la grève étudiante au Québec, publié dans le journal de l’Université de Moncton. L’article contient certains détails qui ne semblent pas être mentionnés ailleurs. Le lien avec le courant alter-mondialiste est attesté ailleurs, mais d’autres éléments sont mis de côté, entre autres sur l’aspect idéologique du mouvement.
Évidemment, il ne s’agit pas d’une analyse exhaustive soulignant toutes les implications sociales de la situation actuelle. Par exemple, dans l’extrait suivant mériterait une analyse plus approfondie:

À l’origine, l’université était une institution qui visait premièrement à former des citoyens responsables, dotés d’un sens critique, capables de questionner le gouvernement en place pour faire progresser la société au complet.

Surtout qu’il semble être mis en opposition avec l’élitisme perçu comme une caractéristique du «modèle américain». Pourtant, les deux fondements de l’éducation en Amérique du Nord sont liés dans l’idéologie pédagogique aux États-Unis. En d’autres termes, la responsabilisation des citoyens est tout autant une caractéristique du «modèle américain» (du moins au niveau idéologique) que le processus de «méritocracie» auquel les universités amércaines font face depuis un certain temps.
De la même manière, la mobilisation collective semble surprendre dans une société individualiste. Pourtant, ce type de mobilisation nécessite un certain individualisme. C’est certainement parce que la notion d’«individualisme» a acquis une connotation négative alors que d’un point de vue sociologique, nous pouvons la définir de façon dégagée.
Aussi cette conclusion que l’histoire peut prouver que la grève est «le seul moyen d’action efficace pour faire entendre les revendications étudiantes» semble un peu hâtive.
Quoi qu’il en soit, un article intéressant. Qui supporte l’idée qu’on peut comprendre un phénomène social sans faire partie de cette société. Sans être observateur neutre, l’auteur de l’article démontre une perspective balancée sur certains aspects de la société québécoise.

Passage amusant: «Nos voisins sont peut-être chialeux, mais au moins ils sont efficaces».

Plagiarism

18.687 is it plagiarism if it’s plagarism or plagirism? from Humanist Discussion Group (by way of Willard McCarty : Note that the word ‘plagiarism’ is spelled no less than three different ways in this message — in addition to the correct way, it is also spelled ‘plagarism’ and ‘plagirism’!

(in reference to this post on the same list)
It’s also spelled “plagiarim” at some point.
In my mind, it’s part of a radical view against plagiarism in which you’re not allowed to spell the same word the same way twice!

Sorry, couldn’t help it…

Anthropological Interdisciplinarity

18.682 interdisciplinarity is anthropological from Humanist Discussion Group (by way of Willard McCarty

Good to see that anthropology’s approach to interdisciplinarity is well-understood.

One thing I have found is that writers are far more cynical of crossing boundaries and marrying mediums than are visual artists.

Interesting. IMHO, musicians and musicologists are either reluctant to cross boundaries themselves or, more commonly, are extremely skeptical of non-musicians saying anything about music. It might just be an impression, but it’s a strong one.